.

15th Congressional District Election Ends Entertaining Campaign; Can We Expect Another?

An entertaining campaign between Rep. Pete Stark, Eric Swalwell and Chris Pareja will come to a conclusion with Tuesday's vote. Will an equally entertaining campaign start Wednesday?

For pure entertainment value, the primary campaign for the open seat in the 15th Congressional District was simply fantastic.

It gave us one great moment after another.

Like when 31-year-old Dublin city councilman Eric Swalwell compared 80-year-old congressman . Or when Rep. Pete Stark accused , then . Or when Stark accused a San Francisco Chronicle writer of contributing to Swalwell's campaign, . Or when Stark accused Swalwell for taking bribes again, and then apologized — again.

Great stuff.

But today it gets serious as voters in the newly formed district head to the polls to narrow down the choices for their next congressman. But don't worry the entertainment isn't over. As Tuesday ends and Wednesday begins, another campaign of craziness is likely coming.

Before we dive into the next campaign, let's first go over what's at stake today.

There are three candidates:

  • Pete Stark — The liberal Democrat who has been in Congress since Richard Nixon was president. Seriously, I'm not exaggerating.
  • Eric Swalwell — Also a Democrat, though slightly less liberal, but a lot younger. Forty-nine years to be exact.
  • Chris Pareja — He's not a Democrat. He's also not Republican, but he is conservative. In other words, he's the other guy.

Of these three men, the two that receive the most votes survive and advance to a general election on Nov. 6. (Just so I'm clear, the candidate that receives the fewest votes also survives, they're just out of the race. I was pretending I was writing about March Madness.)

There has been no public polling of the race but on the surface it seems like Stark and Swalwell are the favorites to finish first and second tonight. Both of the Democrats have a huge financial and organizational advantage over Pareja.

But the problem they face is they're both Democrats. In the new district — which includes San Ramon, Dublin, Pleasanton, Livermore, Castro Valley and Union City — 48.5 percent of registered voters are Democrats, while 23.9 percent are Republicans. The rest are registered with a smaller party or not registered at all.

If Stark and Swalwell split the Democratic vote and if either of them don't pickup enough independent votes, then Pareja could sneak into the top two if he wins almost all of the Republican votes and some independents — on the ballot, Pareja is listed as having "No Party Affiliation".

Though Stark has made a in the campaign and didn't receive the endorsement of the San Francisco Chronicle or the Bay Area News Group (Swalwell did), it still seems unlikely Stark will finish with less votes than Swalwell. Stark has won every election he's been in for 40 years, has outspent Swalwell, received the and has name recognition — finishing behind two newbies would be a shocking end to his political career.

Stark, however, could be seriously vulnerable is in November if he faces Swalwell. Stark is one of the most liberal Democrats in Congress and if Swalwell -- who is a mainstream Democrat but right of Stark -- can convince Republicans to vote for him with the ol', "Hey, you might not like me, but I'm not Pete Stark," argument, he might just make the leap from Dublin City Council to U.S. House of Representatives.

If Pareja finishes in the top two, he will face a massive challenge to beat either of the Democrats head-to-head. He would have to overcome a significant voter registration, organization and financial disadvantage. It would be a David versus Goliath situation and then some.

But, at this point, it's speculation. After the votes are counted tonight, we will know who will campaign against who in Round 2. I just hope the unintended comedy of the general election campaign will match what we've seen so far.

They set the bar high.

----

To learn more about the candidates, read a transcript of Patch's live chat interviews with and . Rep. Pete Stark's campaign didn't respond to an interview request.

Melissa Havea June 05, 2012 at 02:43 PM
I voted!
YellowRose June 05, 2012 at 02:51 PM
So did I, but my daughter couldn't because she had to leave for school. They couldn't find the Republican ballots. It took them 20-25 minutes to locate them. The Republican ballots were found under the Democrats' ballots. Not a good experience for a first time voter, but very educational.
Melissa Havea June 05, 2012 at 02:59 PM
Helen don't let her give up, she can do it after school! She needs to be able to express herself! Go back & give them that vote!
YellowRose June 05, 2012 at 03:05 PM
She will! Thanks! Good Day to everyone
mike Grant June 05, 2012 at 03:47 PM
Vote for the Republican's in CA. Just look at what the Democrats have done to us!
mike Grant June 05, 2012 at 03:49 PM
Vote NO on E!!! No more funds for the Dublin Schools till they all take a 25% cut in pay.
Jean Josey June 05, 2012 at 04:14 PM
Mike, you are comparing apples to oranges. Facilities money has nothing to do with teacher and/or administrator salary. A 25%pay cut is completely ridiculous for the work our wonderful Dublin teachers do. And no matter how you feel about teachers, students can't learn well if the roof is leaking and the technology can't keep up with the times.
mike Grant June 05, 2012 at 04:20 PM
Jean, I'm telling it like it is everyday in the real world. Take a cut pay like all of us have done for the last 3 years and quick whining about the sky is falling. Besides the roof was not leaking on Nielson and they closed it down after they said they would not. Again Vote NO ON E!!!
Camaro on Cinderblocks June 05, 2012 at 06:56 PM
Jean, do you know the price per student of this bond? It's cringe worthy.
Trader Lu June 05, 2012 at 07:43 PM
Chris Pareja offers the only alternative to the deficit building, "I have a great idea on how to spend your money," liberals that control D.C. We are heading over a cliff, following the Europeans - just like lemmings.
Steve June 05, 2012 at 08:10 PM
How can Pete Stark be leading this poll. If anyone watched the Stark/Swallwell/Pareja debate it should be clear that Pete Stark is no longer fit for public office. I hope to see SwalWell and Pareja heading to the November elections. I like Eric, but I like Pareja more. Re: Measure E After reading the information and arguments contained in the Voter Information Pamphlet, I can NOT support measure E. I'm not opposed to supporting a school bond but measure E is poorly conceived. Some issues: The district can bill bond for administration of bond funds. If the district wants my money they should consider work related to the funds as part of their regular duties. Using long term to debt to finance equipment with a short term life span is unacceptable. Bond money should only be used to fund long term assets. There should be tangible assets to show for the 100 plus million dollars they are proposing to spend, and not a bunch of scrap computer equipment. I would rather see these types of expenditures come to voters in the form of a short term parcel tax. Savings from energy efficiency are used to fund teacher’s salaries & benefits. If taxpayers are funding these projects, including solar, then I would prefer the savings go toward paying the bond debt, or back into the pot of bond money to help cover future projects and/or cost overruns. The projects are too broadly defined which leaves me to believe the money can be used for just about anything.
John Foley June 05, 2012 at 09:38 PM
Stark is nasty and rude. Drunk on his own ego. Shame on McNerney for endorsing him. Costly decision.
Camaro on Cinderblocks June 05, 2012 at 10:03 PM
We took the car keys away from our grandfather when he turned 81.
Val June 05, 2012 at 10:51 PM
I agree with Steve and certainly hope that this unscientific poll is not indicative of what is really going on at the polls today. Stark is an arrogant idiot not deserving of anyone's vote.
Big M June 05, 2012 at 11:29 PM
This is why I voted for myself for district 15... Its time for someone who isn't a politician and doesn't want to stay in office for the rest of his life...
Summer Hemphill June 06, 2012 at 07:43 AM
Pete Stark will be re-elected when the Democratic Party turns out in force behind those endorsed by their party leaders. Political neophyte & opportunist Eric Swalwell now the Republican's chosen candidate will need all their votes to make it a remotely close race in November. Not even Patrick Creaven's blatantly biased reporting (cheerleading) can keep party loyalists from returning Pete Stark to Congress for another term. No real Democrat would vote for a Democrat who'd be beholden to Republicans for their election,that's just ludicrous !

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something